ChatGPT: An internet-powered chatbot that wrote essays on subjects including constitutional law, taxation, and torts was able to pass tests at a US law school.
Using artificial intelligence (AI), ChatGPT from OpenAI, a US business that last week received a large funding injection from Microsoft, generates streams of text from straightforward suggestions.
Because of the excellent results, educators have issued warnings that they might encourage widespread cheating or possibly spell the end of conventional classroom teaching techniques.
Professor Jonathan Choi from the law school at Minnesota University administered the same 95 multiple-choice questions and 12 essay questions to ChatGPT.
He and his coauthors revealed that the bot received an overall grade of C+ in a white paper titled “ChatGPT goes to law school” that was released on Monday.
While this was sufficient for a pass, the bot consistently scored in the lowest half of the class and “bombed” math multiple-choice tests.
Not a really good student
The authors stated that ChatGPT “displayed a strong grasp of basic legal norms in composing essays, and had consistently solid structure and composition.”
However, when given an open-ended question, a crucial ability on law school examinations, the bot “frequently struggled to spot errors.”
The use of ChatGPT in schools has been outlawed in New York and other places, but Choi claimed it would be a useful teaching tool.
He stated on Twitter that ChatGPT “wasn’t a fantastic law student acting alone.”
But we anticipate that when working with people, language models like ChatGPT will be highly helpful to both lawyers in practise and law students taking exams.
He also claimed, in response to another Twitter user, that two out of three markers had identified the document that had been authored by a bot. He downplayed any chance of cheating.
They had a hunch, and it turned out to be accurate because ChatGPT had impeccable language and was rather repetitious, according to Choi.